Showing posts with label Legal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Legal. Show all posts

Saturday, April 26, 2014

A Perfect Storm (Part Three of Three)

I don’t know much about John's incarceration.  He did not write frequently and no one from the prison would talk to us or tell us what was going on with him.  John was released on parole after 2 years and we did find out, after he had been released that he was prescribed “a lot of pills” while in jail.  We never did learn what specific medications he had been on or for what because John could not remember the names of them.  He only knew that there were pills to help him stay calm, different pills so he would not be depressed and anxious, and yet more pills to help him sleep.   When John was released he was told he had to live in a halfway house in one of the worst possible neighborhoods of a city about 30 min from our family home.  As soon as John called us – the day he was released - we began attempting to contact his Parole Officer. 

I had spent the period of John's incarceration studying his neuropsych reports and learning about FASD.  We knew from John's probation and from what we had learned about FASD that without support, without an external brain working to help him with the executive functions he lacked John would not be able to successfully navigate parole.  Our mother attempted to accompany John to three different meetings with his PO but was told she had no place there and would not be allowed into the office.  She stayed anyway and tried to write down any instructions or rules John could remember from his meetings with the parole officer but most of what John was able to tell her was very generic. 

“Keep your nose clean, boy.”

“You have another appointment next week.”

“When next week?” she’d ask.  “Um, I think the same as this one?” he would say.    But usually he was wrong about the day, or the time, or where he was supposed to report to; the PO’s office, the drug testing clinic, the Fresh Start support group.  Or if he remembered the day, the time and the place correctly he would lose his bus pass or get on the wrong bus and end up missing the appointment again.

John rapidly became depressed and withdrawn.  Although I live several states away I made the trip to visit him several times to encourage him. I called, faxed, and wrote letters endlessly to John's PO, to the head of that office, even a couple to the State Board of Parole.  No one was willing to so much as answer a call or return a letter.  John had been out about 2 months when I noticed on one visit that he seemed unnaturally lethargic and his eyes were highly dilated.  When I insisted he tell me what he was on he swore up and down he had not used any illegal drugs.  In fact he was at great pains to show me the pack cigarettes he had purchased at the minimart right across from his halfway house. 

It turns out they were a newer form of synthetic marijuana.  For those like me who have no idea what “synthetic marijuana” means – it is a designer drug in which herbs, incense or other leafy materials are sprayed with lab-synthesized liquid chemicals to mimic the effect of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive ingredient in the naturally grown marijuana. The original forms of this sold as both “Spice” and “K2” were banned in 2012.   These drugs have become increasingly popular however, because as each brand of synthetic cannabinoid is banned a new one is promptly developed and “legally” sold until it is added to the list.  John had indeed legally purchased the cigarettes he was smoking but he failed his drug test that week none the less.  He did not understand that.  He had no idea how something he could legally buy at the same place he got his morning Pepsi was illegal.  But he promised not to touch it again and his PO seemed willing to overlook it.  We don’t know for sure what his thoughts were because again he refused to answer any of our attempts to contact him.  The only thing John shared with us from that meeting was he had been told “Take responsibility for your actions and be a man.” 

John continued to miss, and occasionally make, appointments and found a job doing maintenance work as a volunteer for a local church.  He was able to keep good attendance at the church position because they were willing to keep his hours consistent week to week.  We knew things were not ideal with John's situation.  He would tell us occasionally about being afraid of his housemates at the halfway house, things that we purchased for him like clothing, bus passes were stolen or lost, and we knew his attendance at various appointments was spotty.   In spite of this, things seemed to be settling into a holding pattern.  There were no repercussions for his failed drug test and while his living situation was unpleasant John seemed to be doing ok.   We stopped bombarding his PO with requests for contact.  It seemed futile and he did not seem inclined to penalize John for his slip ups.   This was a serious mistake on our part. 

What John's PO was doing was compiling a case to have him returned to prison for his full term.  One day when John turned up at his PO’s office he was met by an officer with a warrant to take him immediately to jail.  He was able to call and tell us where he was but not much else.  He did not understand why he was there or what was going to happen next.  We were frantic.  I called every number and resource I could dig up through the internet.  I finally found two sympathetic and helpful people.  A secretary at the Public Defender’s office who got me the name of the person assigned to John and the date of his parole violation hearing (only 4 days away) and Kay Kelly from the FASD Justice center at the University of Washington.  Kay pointed me to several useful papers written about FASD and the Justice system as well as an excellent web site by David Boulding a Canadian Lawyer who has done a lot of work in the area.   She also helped me dig up the state laws on Parole and violation hearings etc.

Armed with that, I started yet another phone and letter writing campaign.  I wrote a 14 page letter for the PD to give to the judge at John's hearing.  I sent copies of the American Bar resolution on FASD, copies of all the letters I had sent John's  parole officer, and copies of John's  diagnosis and testing results.  John's Public Defender was open-minded and helpful.  The judge was open-minded as well.  All of the violations raised that were related to Bill’s areas of difficulty (ie missed appointments) were dismissed.  The failed drug test, although six month old by this point, was the only complaint upheld.  The PO asked for 24 months in the state penitentiary so John “would learn his lesson”.  Mercifully the judge instead sentenced John to 90 days in a drug rehab boot camp program and instructed that the intake and outplacement coordinator there work with us to help John.

John completed his 90 program with no difficulties and was released to parole residing in our mother’s home.    His new Parole Officer has read all the info we provided on FASD and is working closely with us to help John reach his goals.  John has not had a single violation of the terms of his parole for 3 months now and was granted permission to travel out of state for the holidays.  We celebrated as a whole family for the first time in 3 years.  I don’t remember a holiday sweeter for us since our father passed away. 


I wanted to share this story because it should not be this hard.  All of the systems involved to help a child like John failed him.  A family should not have to fight so much to be allowed to assist someone who is disabled by FASD.  Can you image what the trajectory our brother’s life would be if the public defender and judge at his second trial had not listened to us?  What do you suppose happens to all of the young people who have families less motivated, less informed, or less just plain stubborn than we were?  Our prisons are filled with people on a revolving door program who, just like John, never had a truly fair chance.  

*This story was shared with my brother's permission although I have altered his name to protect his privacy.

Friday, April 25, 2014

A Perfect Storm (Part Two of Three)

When John joined our family my parents were not knowledgeable about FASD in specific, but did have experience parenting other traumatized children.  Of the 6 children they raised 4 came from difficult beginnings.  They by no means did everything right but our father took a special interest in and spent a lot of time with John having just retired from full time work when he arrived.  After almost a year of trial and error and just plain hard work for both John and my parents, he was off of all but one ADHD medication, functioning wonderfully at home, and keeping his grades decent enough at school to be allowed to play on the basketball team.  The next 3 years were good ones.  My parents were strict but loving and John thrived with the high level of structure and attention they provided even if he still struggled mightily at times, particularly at school.

Then, when John was 17 and starting his sophomore year in high school, my father passed away unexpectedly from a heart attack and it all fell apart.  The adult children in our family, including me, all lived far away and my mother could not cope with the grief of losing my dad and three grieving teens, one of which was John.  John began to cut classes, then to skip school entirely.  He lost his place on the basketball team and began running with a different group of friends.  There were multiple in (and out of) school suspensions.  When John stayed out all night our mother called the police, frantic that something might have happened to him.    When the police located him at a friend’s house John admitted to drinking and to smoking pot as well as using pills he got from his “friends,” (both uppers and downers).  This led to another stint in a group home with state mandated rehabilitation services.  He completed his 30 day rehab and returned to living with our mother.  This was the first time any doctor or therapist mentioned FASD to her.  They did not provide any information about FASD or its impact other than to caution her John would be much more susceptible to addictions and to watch him closely for any signs of relapse.

At 18 John hung out with kids who were younger than him chronologically, 15 or 16, but far more worldly and street smart than he was.   They suggested one evening that it would be “fun” to break into the garage of another friend while he was away and mess with his bike.  John fell in with that plan easily enough and when the boy’s parents did not find it at all amusing and called the police John was the only one charged as an adult.  He was charged with and convicted of felony breaking and entering.  John’s lawyer did nothing to raise his disability as part of his defense.  He never even brought it up at sentencing.  Our mother begged the judge to consider the recent loss of our father and John was given 5 years of probation with very strict probation rules.  Any violation of them would mean a 5 year jail sentence.

John managed to hold it together for the rest of his senior year of school and although his grades were very poor he did graduate.   As an “adult” over the age of 18 and a High School graduate, John no longer qualified for any of the state programs he had been part of (respite care, after school programs while my mom worked, etc).  My mom helped him find a job at a grocery store but he was unable to handle the constantly shifting schedule of work hours and was quickly fired for missing work, showing up late, etc.  With too much time on his hands and too little supervision John began to run with the wrong crowd again.  His friends (mostly younger than him again) convinced him that his probation appointments were not “really mandatory” and he began missing them, here and there at first, but more regularly over time.  The probation officer would lecture John about missed appointments but never spoke to our mother, who had no idea this was happening.    John failed a random drug screen and then a second.  He overslept and skipped a third.  Since John was a legal adult it was not deemed necessary to inform our mom of anything going on.   The first hint she had of any problems with his probation was the officer at her door that came to arrest John and take him to county for a parole violation hearing.

Our mother was in no financial shape to afford a private attorney again.  She tried to contact John’s public defender but was rebuffed.  John, embarrassed to have her find out "how badly he had fucked it all up" had asked the Public Defender "not to tell his mom."  Again, John is an adult in the eyes of the law, so a childish desire to prevent our mom's disappointment was interpreted to mean do not involve her at all in his defense.  The judge for John's hearing was again told nothing about John's FASD or any of the testing that had been done documenting his cognitive and executive function issues.  He saw, as most would, a young punk who "didn't learn his lesson the first time" and he ordered that John to serve out his original 5 year sentence in jail with no credit for time already served waiting for trial or while on probation.  


*This story was shared with my brother's permission although I have altered his name to protect his privacy.

Thursday, April 24, 2014

A Perfect Storm (Part One of Three)

**Note - I have my brother's permission to share this story.

I've started to blog about this story about my brother’s involvement with the criminal justice system so many times and stopped.  When I try to write it I seem to either be hysterically emotional, or robotically factual.  I can’t seem to modulate the tone from either extreme.  I've tried to stick with the factual here.  I don;t know that I have totally succeeded.   Is it even possible to do when you care so much?  It was also hard for me to decide where to start this story.  How far back do you go?  The roots of the situation go back before birth right?  

The fact is, my brother John is almost a text book case of how to insure a child affected with FASD ends up tangled up in the criminal justice system.  Every risk factor for the development of secondary disabilities is there.  John was removed from his biological mother’s care – along with his 4 siblings - at the age of 6 for abuse and neglect.  His mother was addicted to both alcohol and drugs.  She was regularly beat up (along with the kids) by various "boyfriends."  John and his twin sister were born alcohol exposed.  Their mother reported no “drug” use while pregnant with them.  The younger two children are confirmed for poly drug and alcohol exposure but none of the children have an FASD diagnosis in the CPS files shared with the families they were placed with and no specific effort to place them in therapeutic foster homes appears to have been made.

By the time he entered the foster care system, in addition to the prenatal alcohol exposure, John had already been abused physically and sexually.  When he rather predictably acted out with rages he was separated from his siblings and bounced from home to home.  By the time he came to our family at the age of 13 he had done two stints in group homes, all kinds of state mandated therapy, and was on a cocktail of 6 different medications to “control his undesirable aggression.” 

The risk factors identified  by over 50 years of research that  increase the likelihood a child with FASD will engage in unhealthy behavior as a teen or an adult (such as the use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs, violence, suicide, or involvement in the criminal justice system) are:


  • Having an IQ above 70.  Check. John tested at 85 at the time he came to us.
  • Lack of early diagnosis.  Check.  John was not formally diagnosed until after he came to us.  He received no interventions targeted at a child with FASD.
  • Experiencing neglect.  Check.
  • Experiencing child abuse (physical or sexual)  Check and Check.
  • Experiencing other family violence.  Check.
  • Family history of substance abuse, mental illness, and / or criminal activities.  Check, Check, and Check.
  • Family access to drugs, alcohol, and weapons. Check, Check, and Check again.
  • Poverty.  Check.
  • Multiple foster placements (or family moves). Check.
  • Early sexual activity. Check.  John reports first being sexually active (voluntarily) at the age of 11 in one of his group home placements.
  • Early academic failures.  Check.



Every possible card that could be stacked against him was from the very the beginning.  

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Oh Happy Day!

I usually blog about my kids but today is about my foster brother.  He also has FASD.  Today he was released on parole to my Mom's care.  I can't tell you what a relief this is.  His whole interaction with the justice system has been a text book case of how the justice system does not understand or deal with FASD appropriately.  Here's how it went

 John* was 18 hanging out with 14 to 16 year olds.  One night the group decided it would be funny to break into the garage of one of the group that did not happen to be present and mess with his bike.  The boy's parents did not find the plan amusing at all.  John was the only legal adult in the group and the only one charged with felony breaking and entering.  He did originally receive probation but at the urging of friends started skipping some of his meetings.  (Cause you don't, like, have to go to all of those, you know?)  His Probation Officer though he needed a "lesson" and revoked his probation.

John spent 2 years in a minimum security jail.  Two years.  He came out with a drug problem.

When he was first released we called, and called, and called, and wrote, and wrote, and wrote to his Parole Officer, his PO's superior, and even, the state parole board.  No one would reply.  We tried attending meetings with John but were turned away.   John was required to live in a half way house in crack central down town.  He had to take a bus 45 minutes and make three exchanges to get to his PO's office or to his drug tests.  After 3 months of successfully navigating that mine field - the PO started changing to random appointment times and moved him into unsupervised housing - still in crack central.  Within 6 weeks of the changes his parole officer revoked his parole for missing appointments and one dirty drug test.

His recommendation was that John serve the remaining 3 years of his original five at the state prison - to teach him a lesson.  Fortunately we were able to convince  his assigned defense attorney and the Judge that John's disability FASD was real and required real accommodations - which he had not received.  He was sent to a 90 Drug Rehab boot camp.   The American Bar Association Resolution on FASD was a big help in this as was the University of Washington Fetal Alcohol and Drug Unit.

I wrote endless letters and made endless calls to facilitate a better solution.  And to insure his Parole Supervision was set up for him to succeed upon release.

Today I got to speak to my brother for the first time in 3 months.  He is with my mom.  He is happy.

So am I.



*not his real name.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Legal Eagle***

Since I’ve been pushing folks to write their senators in support of s2262 legislation Advancing FASD Research, Prevention, and Services Act here, on Facebook, and in person pretty hard I thought it might be interesting for folks to know the status of legislation regarding FASD in general.  I make it a habit to keep up with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD) Center for Excellence’s (the Center)  Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Legislation Report which comes out biannually.  The latest issue of the report was published in October 2012 so the results are quite current.

I find it a bit peculiar that the report looks at legislative activity at the state level but not the federal.  I also thing that the report tends toward an overly optimistic tone, in part because of how it divides the statistics.  The current issue covers legislation introduced between 2003 and April 30, 2012, as well as any status changes as of October 22, 2012.  During that time frame there have been 290 bills (or resolutions, memorial motions, or other pieces of legislation) either entirely or partially related to FASD, identified across 45 States and the District of Columbia.  Of the 290 identified 87 or 30% have been passed / adopted.  The Report is very upbeat about the 30% “pass rate” vs. an average 4% pass rate for bills introduced overall.  This is a bit of an overly rosy interpretation in my opinion.    The 4% rate is determined by looking at all bills (not resolutions, memorial motions etc.) introduced and passed per year.  Not only is the population they are using different the time frame, 9 years’ worth of passes vs one prevents a real apples to apples comparison.
The report also segments the data by “categories” that the legislation addresses like Prevention, Treatment, Funding and Criminalization.* They report the prevalence of legislation as follows:
Prevention                                             43%
Funding                                                 24%
Criminalization                                    13%
Treatment                                             12%
But the categorization method is misleading.  Treatment in this structure covers both treatment of individuals affected by FASD and treatment of alcohol addictions aimed at preventing FASD.  Also funding in much of the legislation is directed by the legislation at a specific target – Prevention, Awareness, or Treatment.    If you look at the details of the items in the Funding and Treatment categories in that light you end up with a very different picture of the legislative makeup:
Prevention **                       72%
Criminalization                    14%       
Treatment of FASD            7%
Also, looking at the pass fail rate of the categories is instructive:
Prevention**                        65% pass rate
Criminalization                    29% pass rate
Treatment of FASD            7% pass rate
If you strip out non-binding resolutions and memorandums passage of legislation aimed at improving the lives of individuals with FASD is WORSE than the 4% average.  So, I’m pushing a bill I think makes a difference.  Is it perfect?  No but what in this world is.  It contains elements of prevention and awareness which are important.  It advances research to better understand FASD.  It also addresses diagnosis and treatment of individuals already suffering.  If you are reading here and you haven’t yet taken action to encourage your senators to advance S2262 please do.  It’s not hard.

*Criminalization is the introduction of criminal penalties against women who have alcohol exposed pregnancies. 
** Prevention including treatment of alcoholism aimed at preventing FASD births.
*** The education I'm getting from trying to effecively advocate for my son is amazing.  Neurobiology, Law, Public Policy, Education Theory, man you name it.